Sales and purchase contract dispute between a technology company in Xiamen and its supplier
Case Summary
The plaintiff, a technology company based in Xiamen, entered into a "Custom Equipment Sales Contract" with the defendant, an equipment supplier from Shenzhen. The contract stipulated that the defendant would supply core production line equipment to the plaintiff, with a delivery period of 90 days from the signing date. However, the defendant delivered the equipment 120 days late and provided units with multiple quality defects. These issues prevented the plaintiff from launching production on schedule, resulting in significant costs for site rent, labor, and order breach penalties. The plaintiff has filed a lawsuit requesting the return of all payments made and compensation for all economic losses incurred.
Key Dispute
Case Strategy
Processing Result
The court ruled that the defendant committed a fundamental breach of contract and must refund the plaintiff the paid amount of 128 ten thousand yuan, compensate for economic losses of 86 ten thousand yuan, totaling 214 ten thousand yuan; the defendant shall bear all litigation costs and judicial appraisal fees.
Encountering a similar legal issue?
Free AI case analysis: Get professional legal advice in 30 seconds to evaluate your case's chances of success and risks.
Recommended Related Cases
Franchise Contract Dispute Between a Catering Company in Fujian and a Franchisee
The franchisee used raw materials not designated by the franchisor without authorization, breaching the franchise agreement. The court ruled that the franchisee is liable for breach of contract, and the franchisor has the right to terminate the agreement.
Commercial DisputesConstruction Contract Dispute Case Between a Xiamen Construction Company and the Project Owner
The employer refused to pay the construction contract price, citing quality issues. After judicial appraisal confirmed the work met quality standards, the court ruled that the employer must pay the full outstanding amount plus overdue interest.
Commercial DisputesContract Dispute Between a Medical Device Company in Fujian and Its Distributor
The distributor violated the exclusive agency agreement by selling across regions. The court ruled that the distributor must bear liability for breach of contract and revoked its exclusive agency qualification.
