Dispute over losses in pension insurance benefits due to a manufacturing company in Fujian failing to pay as required by law
Case Summary
Plaintiff Chen joined Defendant Fujian [Name] Manufacturing Co., Ltd. on 2005/3/1 as a production line operator. No written labor contract was signed, and the defendant never paid social insurance for the plaintiff. On 2024/4/15, Plaintiff reached statutory retirement age. Due to the lack of pension contributions and fewer than 15 years of accumulated service, Plaintiff could not process retirement procedures or receive pension benefits. After multiple requests for compensation were denied by the defendant, Plaintiff filed this lawsuit seeking damages for lost pension benefits from 2005/3/1 to 2024/4/15, totaling 326000 yuan.
Key Dispute
Case Strategy
Processing Result
The court ruled that the defendant, a manufacturing company in Fujian Province, shall compensate the plaintiff, Chen, for pension insurance benefit losses totaling 326000 yuan within ten days from the effective date of this judgment. The defendant shall bear all litigation costs for this case.
Encountering a similar legal issue?
Free AI case analysis: Get professional legal advice in 30 seconds to evaluate your case's chances of success and risks.
Recommended Related Cases
Dispute over double wage difference for failure to sign a labor contract by a technology company in Xiamen
The employer failed to execute a written labor contract with the employee. The employee sued for double wages, and the court ruled in favor of the employee.
Labor DisputeDispute over compensation for illegal termination of labor contract involving a trading company in Fujian
The company unilaterally terminated the employment contract without legal justification. The employee sued for compensation for unlawful termination, and the court ruled in favor of the employee.
Labor DisputeOvertime Pay Dispute Case Involving a Manufacturing Company in Xiamen
The company failed to fully pay overtime wages to the employee. The employee sued for the unpaid overtime, and the court ruled in their favor.
