Property Service Contract Dispute Between a Fujian Property Management Company and Homeowners
Case Summary
Plaintiff Fujian Property Service Co., Ltd. entered into a "Preliminary Property Service Contract" with Defendant Lin, an owner in Xiamen Community, agreeing that Plaintiff would provide property services and that fees would be calculated at 2.8 yuan per square meter per month, payable quarterly. Starting from 1 of 2023, Defendant refused to pay property fees, citing inadequate cleaning, lax security management, and delayed maintenance of public facilities. As of 6 of 2024, Defendant had accumulated unpaid fees totaling 12600 yuan. After multiple failed collection attempts, Plaintiff filed a lawsuit requesting payment of the outstanding fees and liquidated damages.
Key Dispute
Case Strategy
Processing Result
The court ruled that the defendant shall pay the plaintiff the outstanding property management fees of 12600 yuan, along with overdue payment penalties calculated at 0.04% per day on the quarterly outstanding property management fees, from the due date of each quarter's fees until the date of full payment. The defendant shall bear all litigation costs in this case.
Encountering a similar legal issue?
Free AI case analysis: Get professional legal advice in 30 seconds to evaluate your case's chances of success and risks.
Recommended Related Cases
Sales and purchase contract dispute between a technology company in Xiamen and its supplier
The supplier failed to deliver customized equipment on time, delaying the tech company's production line launch. The court ruled that the supplier must compensate for all economic losses.
Commercial DisputesFranchise Contract Dispute Between a Catering Company in Fujian and a Franchisee
The franchisee used raw materials not designated by the franchisor without authorization, breaching the franchise agreement. The court ruled that the franchisee is liable for breach of contract, and the franchisor has the right to terminate the agreement.
Commercial DisputesConstruction Contract Dispute Case Between a Xiamen Construction Company and the Project Owner
The employer refused to pay the construction contract price, citing quality issues. After judicial appraisal confirmed the work met quality standards, the court ruled that the employer must pay the full outstanding amount plus overdue interest.