Maternity Leave Benefits Dispute Involving a Female Employee at a Trading Company in Xiamen
Case Summary
Plaintiff Li joined Defendant Xiamen Certain Trading Co., Ltd. on 2022/6/1 as an Administrative Supervisor under a written employment contract with a monthly salary of 12000 yuan. The defendant provided social insurance for the plaintiff. On 2024/1/15, the plaintiff gave birth to a son and was entitled to 158 days of maternity leave. During this period, the defendant paid the plaintiff only at Xiamen's minimum wage standard of 2030 yuan/month, rather than her regular salary rate. After returning from maternity leave, the plaintiff repeatedly requested the defendant to make up the salary difference, but the defendant refused. Consequently, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit seeking payment of the maternity leave salary difference amounting to 52680 yuan.
Key Dispute
Case Strategy
Processing Result
The court ruled that Defendant Xiamen [Company Name] Trading Co., Ltd. shall pay Plaintiff Li the wage difference for the maternity leave period of 52680 yuan within ten days from the effective date of this judgment, and bear all litigation costs of this case.
Encountering a similar legal issue?
Free AI case analysis: Get professional legal advice in 30 seconds to evaluate your case's chances of success and risks.
Recommended Related Cases
Dispute over double wage difference for failure to sign a labor contract by a technology company in Xiamen
The employer failed to execute a written labor contract with the employee. The employee sued for double wages, and the court ruled in favor of the employee.
Labor DisputeDispute over compensation for illegal termination of labor contract involving a trading company in Fujian
The company unilaterally terminated the employment contract without legal justification. The employee sued for compensation for unlawful termination, and the court ruled in favor of the employee.
Labor DisputeOvertime Pay Dispute Case Involving a Manufacturing Company in Xiamen
The company failed to fully pay overtime wages to the employee. The employee sued for the unpaid overtime, and the court ruled in their favor.
