Dispute over economic compensation for failure to pay social insurance by a catering company in Fujian
Case Summary
Plaintiff Lin joined Defendant Fujian [Name] Catering Management Co., Ltd. on 2022/3/15 as a chef under a written labor contract with a monthly salary of 8000 yuan, valid until 2025/3/14. Throughout the employment period, the defendant failed to pay social insurance premiums for the plaintiff despite multiple requests. On 2024/4/20, the plaintiff resigned citing the defendant's failure to legally contribute social insurance and filed an arbitration claim with the Xiamen Labor and Personnel Dispute Arbitration Commission on 2024/5/10 seeking economic compensation of 20000 yuan for termination. The commission ruled in favor of the plaintiff; dissatisfied, the defendant appealed to the court.
Key Dispute
Case Strategy
Processing Result
The court ruled that Defendant Fujian [Name] Catering Management Co., Ltd. shall pay Plaintiff Lin the severance compensation of 20000 yuan within ten days from the effective date of this judgment, and bear all litigation costs for this case.
Encountering a similar legal issue?
Free AI case analysis: Get professional legal advice in 30 seconds to evaluate your case's chances of success and risks.
Recommended Related Cases
Dispute over double wage difference for failure to sign a labor contract by a technology company in Xiamen
The employer failed to execute a written labor contract with the employee. The employee sued for double wages, and the court ruled in favor of the employee.
Labor DisputeDispute over compensation for illegal termination of labor contract involving a trading company in Fujian
The company unilaterally terminated the employment contract without legal justification. The employee sued for compensation for unlawful termination, and the court ruled in favor of the employee.
Labor DisputeOvertime Pay Dispute Case Involving a Manufacturing Company in Xiamen
The company failed to fully pay overtime wages to the employee. The employee sued for the unpaid overtime, and the court ruled in their favor.
