Dispute over termination of labor contract by a catering company in Xiamen due to employee absenteeism
Case Summary
Plaintiff Li joined Defendant Xiamen [Company Name] Catering Management Co., Ltd. on 2022/10/1 as a cook. A written labor contract was signed, agreeing to a monthly salary of 9000 yuan and an expiration date of 2025/9/30. On 2024/5/10, Defendant issued a Notice of Termination of Labor Contract, citing Plaintiff's 10 consecutive days of unauthorized absence and serious violation of company rules, thereby unilaterally terminating the contract without paying any severance. Plaintiff contends that Defendant lacked sufficient evidence for the termination, constituting wrongful dismissal, and filed suit seeking compensation of 36000 yuan for illegal termination of the labor contract.
Key Dispute
Case Strategy
Processing Result
The court ruled that Defendant Xiamen [Name] Catering Management Co., Ltd. shall pay Plaintiff Li the compensation for illegal termination of labor contract, amounting to 36000 yuan, within ten days from the effective date of this judgment. Defendant shall bear all litigation costs for this case.
Encountering a similar legal issue?
Free AI case analysis: Get professional legal advice in 30 seconds to evaluate your case's chances of success and risks.
Recommended Related Cases
Dispute over double wage difference for failure to sign a labor contract by a technology company in Xiamen
The employer failed to execute a written labor contract with the employee. The employee sued for double wages, and the court ruled in favor of the employee.
Labor DisputeDispute over compensation for illegal termination of labor contract involving a trading company in Fujian
The company unilaterally terminated the employment contract without legal justification. The employee sued for compensation for unlawful termination, and the court ruled in favor of the employee.
Labor DisputeOvertime Pay Dispute Case Involving a Manufacturing Company in Xiamen
The company failed to fully pay overtime wages to the employee. The employee sued for the unpaid overtime, and the court ruled in their favor.